Tuesday, May 27, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) The White House has officially admitted that fake vaccination programs have been used by the United States as a cover for covertly stealing DNA samples from the public as part of the so-called "war on terror." The aim of the scheme, carried out in the Middle East, was to use DNA analysis to identify suspected terrorists who would then be targeted to be killed by the United States.
As the New York Times reported in 2011, "In the months before Osama bin Laden was killed, the Central Intelligence Agency ran a phony vaccination program in Abbottabad, Pakistan, as a ruse to obtain DNA evidence from members of Bin Laden's family thought to be holed up in an expansive compound there." (1)
"CIA agents recruited a senior Pakistani doctor to organize the vaccine drive in Abbottabad, even starting the "project" in a poorer part of town to make it look more authentic," reports The Guardian (2).
This scheme, first unveiled in 2011, is the first time in history that the U.S. government has been forced to admit using a "public health" activity to secretly and illegally harvest DNA from the public in an attempt to assassinate one individual.
How exactly could a vaccination program harvest DNA from people? It's a simple matter, really. As The Guardian explains, "nurses could have been trained to withdraw some blood in the needle after administrating the drug."
White House says it will stop using fake vaccination programs to gather DNA and kill people
Now the White House says it will no longer use fake vaccination campaigns as a tactic in the "war on terror." And the people of the world are supposed to automatically trust this promise even though it comes from the exact same regime that ran the deceptive vaccination operation in the first place.
It's almost as if the White House is saying, "Yeah, we ran a fake vaccination op; we harvested the DNA of your children; we lied to your people under the cover of public health and we got caught... but NOW you can trust us! We promise!"
This seemingly ludicrous promise just surfaced this week as part of a White House announcement that the United States would "not use vaccination programs as cover for spy operations," according to Yahoo News. (3)
The White House is concerned that because of the CIA's use of fake vaccination programs in the past, people in the Middle East no longer trust vaccines. (Gasp! Imagine that!) This has nearly the entire medical establishment freaked out, terrified that somebody somewhere might say "No!" to vaccines and thereby destroy the entire human civilization with polio. Click here to read my recent story on W.H.O. fear mongering and hysterics surrounding the fabricated polio "global health emergency."
According to Yahoo News, White House anti-terrorism advisor Lisa Monaco has now relayed this new claim to the deans of 13 public health schools in the United States. She reportedly added, "the agency will not seek to obtain or exploit DNA or other genetic material acquired through such programs," once again confirming the CIA had been using fake vaccination programs to acquire DNA samples in order to track down human targets for termination.
All this validates the true description that vaccines have been used as weapons of war against individuals the United States considers to be its enemies.
As I've since written, anyone who believes there are no such thing as conspiracies is mentally retarded. The White House, in fact, is openly admitted it ran a "vaccine conspiracy" as a tactic of warfare. (A "conspiracy" merely consists of two or more people plotting to deceive others. This fake vaccination scheme was, by definition, an elaborate conspiracy.)
Pakistan and the WHO's polio fearmongering
But now the backlash against the fake immunization scheme has U.S. officials in a panic. They now realize they've discredited all trust in western vaccines. After all, if the White House now admits using fake vaccination ops to coverly gather DNA evidence, what's to stop the U.S. from using fake vaccination programs to accomplish other nefarious things like injecting people with stealth cancer viruses?
To anyone with half a brain still functioning, however, it's crystal clear that vaccines have already been used as weapons of war by the United States. This is openly admitted now by the White House along with a promise that "we won't do it again."
This is the same White House that promised nationwide GMO labeling, closing down secret military prisons and balancing the federal budget, by the way. In the category of "promises kept," the present-day White House has achieved virtually nothing.
Could U.S. vaccination scheme be used to gather DNA on Americans?
It's no longe an outlandish question. This is precisely what the White House has already admitted to doing on foreign soil. Could the same thing now be conducted on U.S. soil and aimed at Americans?
Of course it could. What better way to get millions of people to line up and voluntarily give up DNA samples than to invent a fictitious "pandemic" and offer a "lifesaving treatment" in the form of a vaccine?
Most of the masses have already been trained to accept any and all injections the government wants them to endure, so as long as a DNA harvesting campaign is framed in the language of "public health," resistance will be virtually nonexistent.
Most of the vaccines Americans already take are utterly useless to begin with. For example, Americans are still being vaccinated against polio even though there hasn't been a single case of polio in the USA for 35 years. To help make sure more people get injected with medically unnecessary polio vaccines, the W.H.O. recently fabricated an hysterical tabloid-style "global health emergency" that inferred we would all die miserable deaths if we didn't immediately rush out to get injected with more polio vaccines.
Five amazing uses for vaccines (as proven by recent history)
Vaccines do have their uses, ultimately. They're really great at these five things:
1) Administering mercury to the population
2) Covertly harvesting DNA from the public
3) Providing a cover story for CIA operations
4) Injecting millions of people with stealth cancer viruses
5) Training the population to practice "medical obedience"
But vaccines are really, really terrible at doing the thing the one thing they claim to be all about: preventing infectious disease.
It turns out the best defenses against infectious disease are:
* Excellent nutrient intake from a wide variety of fresh plants
* Good public hygeine and public sanitation systems
* Healthy levels of vitamin D across the population
* Regular hand washing by medical staff and patients
* Deliberate exposure to friendly microbes in soils and even farm animals
* Avoidance of exposure to immunosuppressive substances such as tobacco smoke or heavy metals
Her website also features a huge collection of eye-opening graphs citing scientific evidence that completely contradicts the false vaccination narrative currently being pushed by the U.S. government.
Example: This graph shows how measles was already virtually eradicated even before the introduction of the measles vaccine. Today, medical institutions falsely claim that vaccines alone are responsible for eradicating diseases like measles, smallpox and polio. But if vaccines alone caused the decline, then why did nearly all the decline in measles happen BEFORE the introduction of the measles vaccine? (Can vaccines travel through time?)
"My understanding is that if a lady's giving birth in August, we would like to see her pregnant in July," said Shrimpton. "It's been established that his (Obama's) alleged mother wasn't pregnant in July; his claimed birth on fourth August does seem to be coming under a certain degree of scrutiny."
Perhaps this is why Obama can't seem to remember his birthday.
However, if the photo that Shrimpton refers to is this one, then this photo has been alleged to have actually been of Barbara Bush, not Stanley Ann Dunham. I have no way of checking his claim, since no photo is actually shown in the video.
Then Shrimpton dropped a bombshell.
"It's also nice to have a DNA relationship with your parents," Shrimpton added. "The DNA test that was done in respect to Barack Obama's claimed grandparents, I understand the CIA (Central Intelligence Community) were unable to obtain a match."
Shrimpton went on to say that the CIA performed a covert DNA testing on Obama during a fundraising dinner using a glass of water. Apparently, the CIA was able to grab a few glasses of water with both saliva and fingerprints to conduct their testing, and according to Shrimpton, the test came back that Barack Obama is not related to his alleged grandparents. Dreams of My Real Father, anyone?
This would explain why Obama doesn't look anything like his family members.
Mr. Shrimpton also alludes to the fact that Rudy Giuliani's people bought him lunch because of what he knew and were "fascinated by his discoveries." Giuliani was hoping to be the Republican candidate at the time. Apparently Hillary Clinton's people were just as interested in Shrimpton's findings.
Michael Shrimpton is a very credible source. According to his website:
Michael Shrimpton is a barrister, called to the Bar in London 1983 and is a specialist in National Security and Constitutional Law, Strategic Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism. He has wide ranging connections both in Western Intelligence agencies and amongst ex-Soviet Bloc agencies. He has also earned respect in the intelligence community for his analysis of previously unacknowledged post WWII covert operations against the West by organizations based in Washington, Munich, Paris and Brussels and which are continuing in post 9-11.
He is Adjunct Professor of Intelligence Studies, Department of National Security, Intelligence and Space Studies, American Military University, teaching intelligence subjects at Master's Degree level to inter alia serving intelligence officers.
He has represented US and Israeli intelligence officers in law and has briefed staffers on the Senate select Committee on Intelligence and the Joint Congressional inquiry into 9-11, also addressing panels on terrorism in Washington DC and Los Angeles.
His active assistance to Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies in the Global War on Terror has produced some notable success including the exposure of the Abu Graib "hood" photograph as a fake.
His work in strategic intelligence takes him on regular trips to the Pentagon and he also met with senior advisors to the President of the Russian Federation in Moscow in November 2005.
He participated in the Global Strategic Review conference in Geneva in 2005 and is a regular contributor at conferences such as Intelcon and the Intelligence Summit in Washington, DC in February 2006.
While the video is a couple of years old, many people have never seen it. This is not a mere reporter, but a British Intelligence advisor. Additionally, his claims tend to support evidence that we compiled from Kenyan Parliament records that indicate Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Scientists Finally Admit There Is a Second, Secret DNA Code Which Controls Genes
The fascinating and recent discovery of a new, second DNA code last week further lends credence to what metaphysical scientists have been saying for millennia — the body speaks two different languages.
Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, researchers have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins.
But biologists have suspected for years that some kind of epigenetic inheritance occurs at the cellular level. The different kinds of cells in our bodies provide an example. Skin cells and brain cells have different forms and functions, despite having exactly the same DNA.
NO SUCH THING AS JUNK DNA
The human genome is packed with at least four million gene switches that reside in bits of DNA that once were dismissed as “junk” but it turns out that so-called junk DNA plays critical roles in controlling how cells, organs and other tissues behave. The discovery, considered a major medical and scientific breakthrough, has enormous implications for human health and consciousness because many complex diseases appear to be caused by tiny changes in hundreds of gene switches.
As scientists delved into the “junk” — parts of the DNA that are not actual genes containing instructions for proteins — they discovered a complex system that controls genes. At least 80 percent of this DNA is active and needed. Another 15-17 percent has higher functions scientists are still decoding.
Recent findings in the journal Science may have big implications for how medical experts use the genomes of patients to interpret and diagnose diseases, researchers said.
The genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. Dr Stamatoyannopoulos with co-authors were stunned to discover that some codons, which they called duons, can have two meanings. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled.
The newfound genetic code within deoxyribonucleic acid, the hereditary material that exists in nearly every cell of the body, was written right on top of the DNA code scientists had already cracked.
Rather than concerning itself with proteins, this one instructs the cells on how genes are controlled.
Its discovery means DNA changes, or mutations that come with age or in response to vibrational changes within the DNA, may be doing more than what scientists previously thought.
“For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said lead author John Stamatoyannopoulos, University of Washington associate professor of genome sciences and of medicine.
“Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture,” he said.
“Many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”
These two meanings seem to have evolved in concert with each other. The gene control instructions appear to help stabilize certain beneficial features of proteins and how they are made.
The discovery was made as part of the international collaboration of research groups known as the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project, or ENCODE.
DNA RESPONDS TO FREQUENCY
The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA. The bottom line was: “Living chromosomes function just like solitonic/holographic computers using the endogenous DNA laser radiation.” This means that they managed for example to modulate certain frequency patterns onto a laser ray and with it influenced the DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and of language (as explained earlier) are of the same structure, no DNA decoding is necessary.
This finally and scientifically explains why affirmations, autogenous training, hypnosis and the like can have such strong effects on humans and their bodies. It is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to frequency. While western researchers cut single genes from the DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically worked on devices that can influence the cellular metabolism through suitable modulated radio and light frequencies and thus repair genetic defects.
Garjajev’s research group succeeded in proving that with this method chromosomes damaged by x-rays for example can be repaired. Garjajev’s research group They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome. So they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA. This represents an unbelievable, world-transforming revolution and sensation! All this by simply applying vibration instead of the archaic cutting-out procedure! This experiment points to the immense power of wave genetics, which obviously has a greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences.