BLEND OF LOVING ENERGIES

http://trutube.tv/video/8292/Project-Blue-Beam-Fake-Alien-Invasion

http://trutube.tv/user/Parsifal

The infamous NASA Blue Beam Project has four different steps in order to implement the new age religion with the antichrist at its head. We must remember that the new age religion is the very foundation for the new world government, without which religion the dictatorship of the new world order is completely impossible.

I’ll repeat that: Without a universal belief in the new age religion, the success of the new world order will be impossible!

That is why the Blue Beam Project is so important to them, but has been so well hidden until now.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soc...

What is the Blue Beam Project?

It involves two things. A technologically simulated "second coming" and the reemergence of new "MONTAUK" type projects that have the ability to take up a whole bunch of people as in a "rapture" type of situation and whisk the whole bunch into never-never land. Ironically, portions of the holographic projections have the potential for changing the planet into oneness with God. Unfortunately, this operates on the premise that Man shall somehow become God in human form and control other Men and dictate all actions and thoughts.

The calculated resistance to the new religion, the New World Order and the new "Messiah" will entail human loss on a massive scale in the ensuing "holy wars". The "BLUE BEAM PROJECT" will pretend to be the universal fulfillment of the prophecies of old; as major an event as that which took place 2000 years ago. In principle, it will make use of the sky as a holographic projection screen for space-based laser-generating satellites (star wars). These projectors will project simultaneous images to the four corners of the planet, in every language by region.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bluebeam04.htm

This video continuously ’disappears’ from screwtube, therefore upload to truetube - Parsifa

Thanks to Parsifal that posted this on one of our BRIDGES

SiNeh~

Computer security specialists have been aware for two years that unusual features are contained inside a standard Windows software “driver” used for security and encryption functions. 

The driver, called ADVAPI.DLL, enables and controls a range of security functions.

If you use Windows, you will find it in the C:Windowssystem directory of your computer.

ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only run cryptographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of view.

Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programs inserted and controlled by NSA.

As yet, no-one knows what these programs are, or what they do.

Recently, Microsoft programmers mistake has revealed that special access codes prepared by the US National Security Agency have been secretly built into Windows.

The NSA access system is built into every version of the Windows operating system now in use, except early releases of Windows 95 (and its predecessors).

The result of having the secret key inside your Windows operating system is that it is tremendously easier for the NSA to load unauthorized security services on all copies of Microsoft Windows, and once these security services are loaded, they can effectively compromise your entire operating system.

The NSA key is contained inside all versions of Windows from Windows 95 OSR2 onwards.

The first discovery of the new NSA access system was made two years ago by British researcher Dr Nicko van Someren.

But it was only a few weeks ago when a second researcher rediscovered the access system.

With it, he found the evidence linking it to NSA.

Two weeks ago, a US security company came up with conclusive evidence that the second key belongs to NSA.

Like Dr van Someren, Andrew Fernandez, chief scientist with Cryptonym of Morrisville, North Carolina, had been probing the presence and significance of the two keys.

Then he checked the latest Service Pack release for Windows NT4, Service Pack 5.

He found that Microsoft’s developers had failed to remove or “strip” the debugging symbols used to test this software before they released it. Inside the code were the labels for the two keys.

One was called “KEY”.

The other was called “NSAKEY”.

According to those present at the conference held in Santa Barbara during this report, Windows developers attending the conference did not deny that the “NSA” key was built into their software.

But they refused to talk about what the key did, or why it had been put there without users’ knowledge.

Microsoft’s top crypto programmers were astonished to learn that the version of ADVAPI.DLL shipping with Windows 2000 contains not two, but three keys.

Brian LaMachia, head of CAPI development at Microsoft was “stunned” to learn of these discoveries, by outsiders.

The latest discovery by Dr van Someren is based on advanced search methods which test and report on the “entropy” of programming code.

Within the Microsoft organisation, access to Windows source code is said to be highly compartmentalized, making it easy for modifications to be inserted without the knowledge of even the respective product managers.

Researchers are divided about whether the NSA key could be intended to let US government users of Windows run classified cryptosystems on their machines or whether it is intended to open up anyone’s and everyone’s Windows computer to intelligence gathering techniques deployed by NSA’s burgeoning corps of “information warriors”.

The good thing is that NSA key inside CAPI can be replaced by your own key, and used to sign cryptographic security modules from overseas or unauthorized third parties, unapproved by Microsoft or the NSA.

This is exactly what the US government has been trying to prevent.

A demonstration “how to do it” program that replaces the NSA key can be found on Cryptonym’s website.

According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be thankful that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before the arrival of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets.

These would make the type of discoveries made this month impossible. “Had the next-generation CPU’s with encrypted instruction sets already been deployed, we would have never found out about NSAKEY.”

http://cyberinsecure.com/microsoft-windows-got-backdoors-for-nsa/

@

http://cyberinsecure.com

related:

Microsoft' Is JEWISH Company - Stormfront

Every Windows system has Secret Backdoor for NSA and Mossad

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t557249/

NSA - Windows backdoor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMRwr5SfjnU

Uploaded on 29 Feb 2012 by glontulsauscutul

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Additional commented by Parsifal

Microsoft Says Speculation About Security and NSA Is "Inaccurate and Unfounded"
Sept. 03, 1999
Microsoft Corp. said that speculation about Microsoft® Windows® security and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) is "inaccurate and unfounded."

more

Wall Street Journal Disputes Legitimacy of Flight 93 Phone Calls

Posted by Steve Beckow on May 29, 2013

Say what? The Wall Street Journal posted an article disputing the legitimacy of the Flight 93 phone calls on 9/11? Is this what we’ve been waiting for?

Flight 93 landed safely at Cleveland’s Hopkins Airport. Its passengers disembarked and went into a building, never to emerge again. (1) Thanks to Fred Burks.

The 9/11 Phone Calls: Disturbing Irregularities Uncovered in the Calls that Flashed around the World

Wall Street Journal, May 16, 2013

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130516-909978.html

NEW YORK, May 16, 2013 /PRNewswire/ — America first learned of the 9/11 hijackings from Solicitor-General Ted Olson, who reported two calls from his wife, well-known CNN commentator Barbara Olson.

From American Airlines Flight 77, Barbara Olson fleshed out the drama of diminutive Muslim hijackers using knives and box-cutters to herd dozens of passengers to the rear of the plane.

These and other reported calls have now been examined by the 9/11 Consensus Panel of scientists, pilots, professors, attorneys, and journalists.

The Panel began its research in 2011 with the Twin Towers and the sudden, stunning collapse of adjacent Building WTC7, a massive 47-storey steel-framed skyscraper.

The official conclusion that all 82 support columns failed simultaneously from fire alone has for years raised serious questions about the official account.

The 9/11 Consensus Panel now offers four evidence-based Points about the alleged phone calls from the 9/11 flights.

The famous “let’s roll” drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer’s 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephone supervisor Lisa Jefferson, who reported Beamer as strangely tranquil, declining to speak to his wife. Eerily, Beamer’s line remained open for 15 minutes after the crash.

Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer’s cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.

Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.

Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.

During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) “unconnected” call from Barbara Olson, lasting “0 seconds.”

In another twist, two other women reported that Caller-ID showed their husband’s cell numbers on their answering machines, which while lasting several minutes, had been made from elevations of 25,000 and 35,000 feet.

Finally, although the FBI conducted a massive investigation into the calls, none of the telephone billing, nor any of the cell phone location data stored in standard phone company records has been publicly released.

The 9/11 Consensus Panel has developed 32 Points of evidence.

SOURCE The 9/11 Consensus Panel

/Web site: http://www.consensus911.org

 Footnotes

(1) “[Mayor] White said that the plane had been removed to a secure area of [Hopkins] Airport and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93.” (WCPO-TV, Cincinatti, 9/11/01, 11:43:57, Loose Change, as reported in 9/11 Conspiracy: Flight 93 Crashes at Camp David Part 2, downloaded from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKHXBWvjUnY&mode=related&search=, 1 August 2007.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Comment by SiNeh~

Now what? the Video that is mentioned in the footnotes isn't available anymore You Tube CLOSED that account! And Steve just posted that today. I don't think Steve would add a video in a footnote if he haven't seen it before posting!