CONSPIRACIES
’Tsunami Bomb’ Tested off New Zealand Coast
Category: CONSPIRACIES
Tags: CONSPIRACY THEORIES ILLUMINATI CONSPIRACY NEWS

 ’Tsunami Bomb’ Tested off New Zealand Coast​

By Jonathan Pearlman | Telegraph.co.uk

The United States and New Zealand conducted secret tests of a “tsunami bomb” designed to destroy coastal cities by using underwater blasts to trigger massive tidal waves.

The tests were carried out in waters around New Caledonia and Auckland during the Second World War and showed that the weapon was feasible and a series of 10 large offshore blasts could potentially create a 33-foot tsunami capable of inundating a small city.

The top secret operation, code-named “Project Seal”, tested the doomsday device as a possible rival to the nuclear bomb. About 3,700 bombs were exploded during the tests, first in New Caledonia and later at Whangaparaoa Peninsula, near Auckland.

The plans came to light during research by a New Zealand author and film-maker, Ray Waru, who examined military files buried in the national archives.

“Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people,” said Mr Waru.

“It was absolutely astonishing. First that anyone would come up with the idea of developing a weapon of mass destruction based on a tsunami … and also that New Zealand seems to have successfully developed it to the degree that it might have worked.” The project was launched in June 1944 after a US naval officer, E A Gibson, noticed that blasting operations to clear coral reefs around Pacific islands sometimes produced a large wave, raising the possibility of creating a “tsunami bomb”.

Mr Waru said the initial testing was positive but the project was eventually shelved in early 1945, though New Zealand authorities continued to produce reports on the experiments into the 1950′s. Experts concluded that single explosions were not powerful enough and a successful tsunami bomb would require about 2 million kilograms of explosive arrayed in a line about five miles from shore.

“If you put it in a James Bond movie it would be viewed as fantasy but it was a real thing,” he said.

“I only came across it because they were still vetting the report, so there it was sitting on somebody’s desk in the archives.”

Forty years after the joint testing, New Zealand faced a dramatic breakdown in its security ties with the US after it banned the entry of nuclear-armed ships from entering its territory during the 1980s. The dispute led to the US downgrading its relationship with New Zealand from an “ally” to a “friend”.

In his new book Secrets and Treasures, Mr Waru reveals other unusual findings from the archives including Defence Department records of thousands of UFO sightings by members of the public, military personnel and commercial pilots.

Some of the accounts of the moving lights in the sky include drawings of flying saucers, descriptions of aliens wearing “pharaoh masks” and alleged examples of extraterrestrial writing.

http://worldtruth.tv/tsunami-bomb-tested-off-new-zealand-coast/#

New Studies: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Sane; Government Dupes Crazy, Hostile
Category: CONSPIRACIES
Tags: 9/11 alternative science consciousness False Flag Events globalist agenda media and politics mind control

We've known this all along but it's interesting to see it coming to light in this well researched manner.. SiNeh~

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

PressTV

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

MORE>>

 

US Farmers Conspire With Food Industry To Hide GMO Products
Category: CONSPIRACIES
Tags: frankenfood Genetically Modified Products GMO Foods monsanto

US Farmers Conspire With Food Industry To Hide GMO Products

 Washington (AFP) – US farmers joined with the food industry Thursday to launch a united front against labeling genetically modified products, amid mounting consumer pressure and an ongoing trade dispute with China.

us-farmers-conspire-with-food-companies-to-hide-gmo-labels-monsanto-frankenfood

California narrowly rejected a 2012 initiative to require GMO labeling, which was fought with tens of millions of dollars in advertising from corporate giants like DuPont, Monsanto, Syngenta, Kraft, Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

More than half of US states introduced bills aimed at requiring GMO labeling last year, in a country where 80 percent of the food contains ingredients that were made with genetically modified organisms.

While only two states have passed such measures, and none have yet implemented any labeling requirements, farmers are clearly concerned about the prospect.

“If each state had a different label requirement, our farmers just couldn’t adapt to that and really economically grow safe, affordable food,” said Ray Gaesser, president of the American Soybean Association which represents 600,000 US farmers.

Gaesser estimated that any new state-by-state labeling laws would hike prices 15 to 30 percent.

Stressing the lack of scientific evidence that GMOs cause harm, Gaesser joined with corn farmers, bakers, restaurants, fisheries, animal feed and grocery store groups in forming the 30-member Coalition for Safe Affordable Food.

obama-signs-monsanto-protection-act-gmo-corn-frankenfood

Obama signs the Monsanto Protection Act

The umbrella group aims to “avoid unnecessary and confusing 50-state patchwork of GMO labeling laws,” said Pamela Bailey, president and CEO of the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

Instead, members are calling for a federal solution that would only mandate GMO labeling “if the FDA, our nation’s foremost food safety authority, determines that there is a health or safety risk,” she told reporters.

“Up until now, (the) FDA has said GMO technology is safe and it would be misleading to mandate a label on a GM product,” Bailey said.

Recognizing that some consumers want to know more about what is in the foods they eat, Bailey asked the FDA “to outline clear labeling standards that companies can use voluntarily.”

millions-against-monsantoCorn, soybeans and sugar beets have been genetically modified in the United States for many years, and farmers say these altered seeds are more resilient against pests and harsh weather.

Wheat is the only major crop that has not gained approval for genetic modification, as the prospect of GMO wheat faces resistance from foreign exporters, particularly in Asia.

When it comes to corn, which is typically accepted abroad in GMO form, an ongoing dispute with China remains unresolved and is dampening global trade.

China has blocked or cancelled hundreds of thousands of tons of a certain strain of GMO corn produced in the United States since late last year, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

“If there was any indication that GMO ingredients were not safe, we would not be using them,” said Martin Barbre president of the National Corn Growers.

“Obviously there is a little issue with China now as we speak but we are working to get that resolved.”

Consumer pressure in the United States is a key driver of state ballot initiatives that aim to label GMO foods, and health advocacy groups like the Center for Food Safety have said to expect more in the year ahead.

California narrowly rejected a 2012 initiative to require GMO labeling, which was fought with tens of millions of dollars in advertising from corporate giants like DuPont, Monsanto, Syngenta, Kraft, Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

Only Maine and Connecticut have approved GMO labeling measures, though no changes have come into effect because the laws require several contiguous states to first adopt similar labeling requirements.

GMO technology “has been used safely in our food supply for 20 years,” said Bailey. ”Efforts to label these foods otherwise are often the product of misinformation.” 

 

source – Yahoo News

 

RELATED STORY: Outrage As Obama Signs ‘Monsanto Protection Act’ Into Law

RSS
Search a Blog

May 2014 (1)
April 2014 (582)
March 2014 (692)
February 2014 (747)
January 2014 (962)
December 2013 (852)
November 2013 (858)
October 2013 (858)
September 2013 (781)
August 2013 (692)
July 2013 (692)
June 2013 (678)
May 2013 (687)
April 2013 (134)
Blog Categories

WHO IS ONLINE
Support B.O.L.E.

Your support to have the B.O.L.E. (incl.all articles) open and free for everyone is much appreciated.

Shop with us by AMAZON

or by clicking on

In Your Service

B.O.L.E.

 

 

A Time To Act - One Step

UNIVERSAL ONENESS


This website is powered by Spruz